To find out, I did the following test:
- run the ATS 909 with the Octaplumb
- run the AR3030 with the Octaplumb
At the same frequency, measuring SNR (using WSPR) of stations receivable via ground wave.
On 600m, that was the result:
2010-03-03 21:26 | G4JNT | 0.503884 | -11 | IO90iv | PA1GSJ | 406 | ||||
2010-03-03 21:22 | PA3EGO | 0.503927 | +10 | JO22mb | PA1GSJ | 52 | ||||
2010-03-03 21:14 | G4JNT | 0.503881 | -22 | IO90iv | PA1GSJ | 406 | ||||
2010-03-03 21:14 | PA3EGO | 0.503923 | -1 | JO22mb | PA1GSJ | 52 |
It seems, the AR3030 has got a 11dB advantage in SNR over the ATS 909. In other words, the relatively inexpensive ATS 909 is just 11dB short (in SNR) to one of the world's finest receivers.